Monday, November 16, 2009

Ouch.

The Patriots lost by 1 point to the Colts last night. The last 2 minutes were pretty painful to watch. Should the Pats have punted at fouth-and-two? Conventional wisdom says yes, but I would have taken the gamble too. The way I see it, there is less than 2 minutes on the clock and you're only a couple yards away from a first down. Risky, sure. But, if you have Tom Brady and are confident enough in your O-line, why not go for it? No guts, no glory. Well, according to everyone in the football world this morning, it was a bad gamble/call. Of course everyone's going to say that because they lost. It would be a different story had the plan worked like it was supposed to. It was just a risk that didn't work in our favor. Not much we can do about it now. At least the loss was to Peyton Manning, who is a funny guy and a great quarterback, so I don't mind when teams lose to him...but it's the Pats and Tom freakin' Brady! Brady is SO much hotter! If only wins were based on hottness in your uniform ((sigh)). 

The Pats go against the Jets next weekend...I'm hoping they pull out the win here cuz they have the Saints after that (eeks!) and need the momentum. Plus we lost to the Jets earlier in the season, so it would be nice to pay them back ;)

1 comment:

  1. Sorry for the loss bep. With Brady and the run game being pretty solid, it's a gamble you'd expect to win, but this one I put on the coach. You gotta play it safe, make the Colts drive the length of the field, with the clock against them. I'm not a fan of playing not-to-lose, but this is a situation where it's arguably the safest bet.

    If this comes up again in the playoffs, you can be sure Belichick doesn't make the same mistake and punts the ball.

    ReplyDelete